The ICJ Rules That Failing to Combat Climate Change Could Violate International Law
1 min read
Summary
International judges ruled that countries failing to sufficiently combat climate change could be violating international law, and risk being accused of causing damage to humanity.
The ruling stated that all countries should take preventive measures to hinder the harmful effects of greenhouse gas emissions, and that these efforts should be jointly enforced.
predecessor cases led by the Netherlands to hold major oil companies accountable for their role in climate change, and a case filed against Brazil for rolling back environmental protections in the Amazon.
This development could enable further climate-related litigation against polluters, and may encourage the implementation of international climate agreements.
While the ruling is not legally binding, the advisory opinion urges political action on climate change.
The decision was requested by the government of Vanuatu, an island nation vulnerable to climate hazards.
